1. Porn Studio Reverses Policy - Goes Bareback
2. 6 Truths About Faggotry
3. 5 Truths About The Gay Porn Industry
4. Who's The Hypocrite..?
1. Porn Studio Reverses Policy - Goes Bareback
1. A well known gay porn studio, recently reversed its policy of requiring condoms for its "actors" and produced a hot 3-way bareback flick - supported by a Notice, a Disclaimer and a Warning.
2. Paraphrasing from memory (FuelMix stupidly lost the link to the video):
- The Notice stated that the actors were rigorously screened using the latest tests for STDs and HIV;
- The Disclaimer stated that the studio did not endorse bareback sex;
- The Warning
stated that pursuant to the testing of the actors, the barebacking
scenes were filmed under strictly controlled conditions and should not
be replicated - even with one's regular partner;
3. This set tongues wagging, with Politically Correct fags rimming the same intellectual asshole.
The gist of their slobbering was that the studio sent out the wrong message, had abdicated its social responsibility, was being hypocritical, was only barebacking for money and viewers, and creating sensationalism.
4. FuelMix presents an alternative view for his readers consideration:
2. 6 Truths About Faggotry
- Nothing beats bareback. Period
- There has been a resurgence in bareback sex across all age groups, but especially in the 20 somethings;
- Fags have done - and are doing - bareback more than they will publicly admit;
- Fags watch more bareback porn than they will publicly admit;
- Politically correct Faggotry has done a masterful job of overt Behavioural Modification. It has trained fags to feign righteous indignation or horror at the mere mention of bareback;
- There is a disconnect between what fags will say about bareback and what they will do;
3. 5 Truths About the Gay Porn Industry
- Competitive and cut-throat;
- No shortage of "actors" across all ages willing to bareback;
- Several studios openly and defiantly promote bareback. Some have done so for decades;
- Some studios specializing in BB will openly hire HIV+ actors;
- Not a single fag has called for those studios to be shut down;
4. Who's The Hypocrite..?
1. Who's the hypocrite? The studio for overtly reversing its policy or the fag who
covertly watches BB porn
and fucks bareback, but who
overtly spouts the PC line?
(a) The Notice - FuelMix has no further comment on it.
(b) The Disclaimer - Showing BB and simultaneously saying it has not been endorsed, is
NOT hyprocritical.
That disclaimer is done all the time on TV Shows when a potentially controversial viewpoint is presented and the TV management airs it, but backs off from endorsing it.
There's a real distinction between what they normally do and implicitly endorse and what they will do which they explicitly will not endorse.
In other words, the controversial viewpoint, or the BB sex,
is presented on an "As Is" basis.
- Is the TV station presenting a controversial point of view to get viewers..? Yep.
- Is the controversial BB sex presented to get viewers..? Yep.
- Are both being done for profit..? Yep.
- Can a controversial viewpoint aired by a TV station that had not yet done that, be as surprising as watching BB from a gay porn studio that had not done that..? Yep.
- Do you have a choice whether to listen to a controversial viewpoint or watch BB sex..? Yep
- In either case, does it amount to sensationalism..? Nope.
- Does the TV station or the porn studio risk getting badmouthed or boycotted..? Yep.
- Are they likely to completely lose their viewer base..? Nope.
(c) The Warning -
stated that pursuant to the testing of the actors, the barebacking
scenes were filmed under strictly controlled conditions and should not
be replicated - even with one's regular partner.
Fags got riled about this one alleging it was not strictly controlled and that the studio had no business airing BB sex and then saying it shouldn't be replicated even with one's regular partner.
Who's right?
(A) Strictly Controlled Conditions ?
1. The culture of hedonism and instant gratification that pervades Faggotry, stands in stark contrast to anything that hints of control or regulation. It simply sticks in the fag's craw to be presented with an assertion that a personal or sexual situation is monitored. But the same fag will have no trouble believing a TV announcement that some stunt is being done under controlled conditions and should not be tried at home.
2. That's because large chunks of a fag's life are out of control. A fag either drifts in complacency, bristles in denial, is too drug-fucked to care or lurches from one drama to another. Handling an apparent truth does not come easy.
3. A fag needs anonymous sex one way or another, whether online, on the street, in the bars or in the saunas. Very little meaningful information is said - or encouraged to be said. Certainly far less than what would be required to complete an analysis of the latest STD testing. The
" strictly controlled conditions" in a fag's anonymous sex are limited to who's Top, who's Bottom, BB or condom and who cums where.
(B) BB Not To Be Replicated - Even With A Regular Partner.. ?
That was a smart warning from the studio.
1. A fag by definition is promiscuous. Whether it's a FuckBuddy or Friends With Benefits, chances are he has several dicks around town with whom he's had sex on more than one occasion.
Straight out of the gate, the fag has multiple regular partners - about whose sexual history he knows nothing, other than their [fake] names.
2. Add to that the casual acquaintances he'll play with more than once in the Steam Room or Dark Room, and the picture becomes clear:
Regular does NOT mean safe.
3. Then add those fags he knows fuck-all about but hooks up with via Grindr, Growlr, Scruff, Jackd etc
4. Then add those fags claiming to be in a "relationship" (you know the type......"We have an open relationship, but we're emotionally faithful......" ). How many of those absolutely know what their "partner" is up to, with whom and when? What about those hamstrung by "Don't Ask, Don't Tell....?" It may have been scrapped in the military, but it's a staple in so many gay dynamics.
5. Then add those
fags on the DownLow regularly fucking women.
6. Then add those
fags whose judgment is fucked by drugs in the heat of the moment.
7. Therefore, not only does "Regular" NOT mean safe but the fag routinely / out of habit / out of compulsion / out of horniness / out of a lack of communication / out of a lack of honesty / out of addiction,
compounds his risk - exponentially. In other words, neither he nor his regular partner can be trusted.
8. So.......when the studio said don't do BB even with a regular partner, they had a valid point.
9. The only 2 occasions that BB with a regular partner might work are:
- Both are absolutely honest and 100% monogamous and tested regularly; OR
- Both have the same strain of HIV;
10. Apologies to those fags who
bashed the porn studio for hypocrisy, but FuelMix doesn't see anything hypocritical in what they did. Fags, on the other hand.....
Originally published 11 February 2013
Amended and Republished 21 May 2017
Copyright © 2006 – 2017 FuelMix All
Rights Reserved
ON A MOBILE DEVICE, VIEW THE WEB VERSION OF THE BLOG
