LATEST VERSION OF THE BLOG, CLICK HERE

IDEAS / COMMENTS: fuelinjectedmale@live.hk

EMAILS MUST HAVE A VALID SUBJECT LINE

FuelMix - ATTITUDE AND ILLUMINATION

FuelMix   - ATTITUDE AND ILLUMINATION

NOTICE

1. THIS BLOG IS NOT FOR EVERYONE. CHECK YOUR ELIGIBILITY VIA AWKWARD QUESTIONS.

2. WHY ARE BLOG POSTS REPUBLISHED? CLICK HERE

Friday, November 07, 2014

Speech Impediments

"Everything has changed, except our way of thinking".
-------Albert Einstein

When a white politician or white official criticizes the actions of a foreign country, white media refers to his remarks as:
  • “carefully worded remarks” ; or
  • “an expression of concern” ; or
  • “a strongly worded statement” ; or
  • “an important statement of policy”; or
  • “issued a clear warning”; or
  • “ laying down a doctrine of policy”; or
  • “reiterating a stance”;

But when a foreign (i.e. Asian, Oriental, Russian, South American, Latin American, African, Middle East) politician or foreign official criticizes the actions of a white country, white media refers to his remarks as:
  •  “ a rant”; or
  • “launched into a tirade”; or
  • “lashed out at…..”; or
  • “shot his mouth off about….”; or
  • “lambasted….”; or
  • “mocked the actions of……”; or
  •  " spewed rhetoric....";
So, if the implication is that only a white’s remarks carry more gravitas, are carefully weighed, delivered in a measured, logical and rational manner, how is it that:
  • White economic policy;  and
  • White monetary policy;  and
  • White foreign policy;
(all given the appropriate gravitas by some white politician or official) are so patently absurd, disastrous and insane......that they are openly laughed at in Asia, The Orient, Russia, South America, Latin America, Africa and the Middle East...???

Originally published 22 March 2011. 
Amended and Republished 27 January 2012 | 7 November 2014

Copyright © 2006 – 2014 FuelMix All Rights Reserved 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.