Hooray For Hollywood 1
Underlining, highlighting and bold print by FuelMix:
Harvey Weinstein’s sexual harassment scandal isn’t only an indictment of his twisted soul, but of America’s as well.
The story of Weinstein, the uber-powerful film producer, co-founder
of Miramax Films and major donor to Democratic politicians, who got
fired from his job as co-Chairman of The Weinstein Company after the New York Times ran an article
exposing his serial sexual harassment of female employees, is such a
perfect storm of corruption, depravity and hypocrisy that it exquisitely
encapsulates the moral decay of America.
The New York Times piece revealed that Weinstein has settled
at least eight different sexual harassment lawsuits over the years. The
article was just the tip of a really grotesque iceberg, for in its wake
a plethora of other claims has surfaced.
In a New Yorker article,
written, ironically enough, by Ronan Farrow, son of alleged pedophile
Woody Allen, even more claims emerged of Weinstein’s predatory behavior.
One of the many lowlights from that article includes Italian
actress/filmmaker Asia Argento and two other women claiming that
Weinstein raped them.
The most famous women
among the sea of those claiming harassment at the hands of the movie
mogul are Gwyneth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie, Ashley Judd, Rose McGowan and
Rosanna Arquette.
The odiousness of this Weinstein scandal is overwhelming, and nearly
every public person is going through the Kabuki theater of denouncing
Harvey and his lecherousness, but this strikes me as disingenuous at
best. All the movie stars, media members, and politicians strongly
reprimanding Weinstein now, displayed nothing but egregious cowardice
during Harvey Weinstein’s grotesque reign of wanton terror.
Many Hollywood heavyweights like Meryl Streep, George Clooney, Ben Affleck and Jennifer Lawrence,
are feigning ignorance of Weinstein’s disgusting depravity, but the
revelation of Weinstein’s repulsive misdeeds cannot possibly come as a
surprise. Harvey, the rotund and repugnant Hollywood kingmaker, is
notorious in the film industry for his petulant and imperious approach,
which includes physically abusing underlings and being a lascivious
beast to women. Tales of Weinstein’s bad behavior are so legion that
even a complete nobody like me has heard them ad infinitum.
So how did Harvey get away with being such a gigantic creep for so
long? The main reason is that he possessed the rarest talent that all of
Hollywood covets, the ability to garner Oscar votes for his films.
Weinstein produced films have been nominated for Best Picture 26 times
in the last 28 years and have been nominated overall for over 300
Academy Awards. In other words, Harvey could make people rich and famous
beyond their wildest dreams, which is why so many in Hollywood checked
their humanity and ethics at the door and looked the other way when he
was being such a troglodyte. To quote Upton Sinclair, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
Blind ambition isn’t the only reason Hollywood looked the other way
regarding Weinstein, political expediency played a part as well.
Weinstein has been a long time supporter of Democratic candidates, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in particular, and has donated a lot of money to their campaigns.
A perfect example of someone making a devil’s bargain with Weinstein
for political reasons is Lena Dunham. Dunham, a vociferous and vocal
Clinton supporter and devout feminist, admitted she knew of Weinstein’s
predatory reputation in regards to women, but still shook his hand and
performed at a fundraiser he held for Clinton’s campaign. Dunham said she betrayed her feminist values because “she so desperately wanted to support Clinton.”
Hollywood liberals were quick to denounce Evangelical Christians for
supporting Trump despite his moral turpitude and misogyny, calling them
hypocrites. I agree that Evangelicals are hypocrites for supporting
Trump, but so are Hollywood liberals for enabling Weinstein. Both sides
need to get off their high horse and read Matthew 7:5, “You
hypocrite! First, remove the beam out of your own eye, and then you can
see clearly to remove the speck out of your brother’s eye.
Speaking of enabling, the Weinstein scandal brought to my mind a line from a U2 song, “if you need someone to blame, throw a rock in the air, you’ll hit someone guilty.” When I throw my rock, it often lands on the media, and so it is with this case.
Ronan Farrow published his Weinstein story in the New Yorker magazine, but only because his employer NBC news refused
to go with the story. NBC is in business with Weinstein on various film
and television projects, and no doubt did not want to ruffle the
feathers of such a powerful and litigious man like Harvey Weinstein, so
they passed on it, which means this story says just as much about them
as it does about Weinstein.
Even the New York Times, which broke the Weinstein story,
came out smelling less like a rose and more like a manure pile after it
became known the newspaper spiked a similar story regarding Weinstein in 2004 after being pressured by the producer and his lawyers to do so.
The New York Times dropping the ball on an important story
in the early 2000’s should come as no surprise to anyone who followed
the lead up to the Iraq War or Bush Surveillance but what was shocking was who helped to scuttle the 2004 Weinstein article. Matt Damon, yes, Matt Damon, Mr. Good Will Hunting, and thought-to-be good guy called the Times
reporter to defend and vouch for Weinstein to stop the story. So did
everyone’s favorite Gladiator Russell Crowe. I wonder how Damon and
Crowe sleep at night knowing they were complicit in thirteen more years
of Weinstein’s abusing women?
It is uncomfortable to acknowledge, but another group of people who
could have stopped Harvey Weinstein but did not were the more famous of
his victims, like Gwyneth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie, Mira Sorvino and
Ashley Judd. These women did not ask to be placed in this terrible
position, but they could have stopped him cold if they came forward
years ago. The reason I cite them and not the other victims is because
they were uniquely positioned to be able to defend themselves and to
take on Harvey Weinstein, where the other victims were not. What I mean
by that is that Paltrow, Jolie, Sorvino, and Judd all come from
entertainment families that are well-known and liked in the industry.
They were not powerless because they have strong allies and deep
connections in the business. These women, sans Judd, also won Oscars,
giving them, even more, credibility and visibility to make their claims.
I do not “blame” these women for being harassed or assaulted
by Weinstein, I only wish they overcame their ambition and saved others
from that awful fate.
The cavalcade of condemnation for Weinstein will continue unabated
for the days and weeks to come, and deservedly so, but to see him only
as a target of derision diminishes his impact as a cautionary tale.
Weinstein is simply a symptom of the wider disease which I call “reality show America,”
which sees human beings as disposable and transactional objects whose
value is measured in terms of their usefulness for entertainment or
pleasure.
The true power of the Weinstein story is not about his personal failings, but that it is symbolic of the fact that “reality-show America”,
which thrives across the political and cultural spectrum, is a
collection of self-serving, amoral, hypocrites who are quick to attack
the failings of their enemy but slow to embrace self-reflection.
Will the denizens of “reality-show America” in Hollywood,
Washington and the news media ask themselves how they have contributed
to the culture that bred a man like Harvey Weinstein? I sincerely doubt
it since deflection, emotional myopia and historical amnesia are as
American as apple pie.
This scandal is an opportunity, not only to see Weinstein for who he
really is but also to see America for what we have become…an ethically
bankrupt and indecent collection of moral cowards allergic to
self-reflection and truth.
This “reality-show America”, currently starring the Trumps
and Kardashians (with special guest appearance by the Clintons!) and
produced by Harvey Weinstein, reveals that America has devolved to the
point of shameless obscenity, and regardless of how self-righteous we as
liberals, conservatives, Democrats or Republicans may feel, we no
longer possess any moral authority because, just like Harvey Weinstein,
Hollywood, Washington and Wall Street, we are incapable of being honest
with ourselves.
It is difficult to admit, but if we mustered the courage to see
ourselves as we truly are, we would recognize that Harvey Weinstein is
America, and America is Harvey Weinstein. Both are bloated, entitled,
corrupt, bombastic, blindly ambitious bullies, full of fear and
loathing, that use their outsized power to exploit the defenseless to
indulge their darker impulses and insatiable desires. The sooner we
recognize that, the faster we can try to change it.
-----"Weinstein Scandal: What it tells us about celebs, politics and Hollywood" by Michael McCaffrey, October 13, 2017, Covert Geopolitics
FuelMix says:
1. One of the better articles we've read on this story.
2. As mentioned before in this blog, these are the days of the Apocalypse, the true meaning of which, is that which was hidden is now revealed.
3. Our view is that Weinstein's little "scandal" is only the preview of something much larger and much more grotesque that involves Hollywood, the financial and political elite:
- child abduction;
- child torture;
- child rape;
- pedophilia;
- child human sacrifice;
Copyright © 2006 – 2017 FuelMix All Rights Reserved
ON A MOBILE DEVICE, VIEW THE WEB VERSION OF THE BLOG
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.