My Best Side

Here’s an example of the sugar-coated, asinine, sub-cultural craving for validation that should make any thinking gay man with a functioning sperm count, cringe:

(Underlining by FuelMix):

The One In Ten Screenplay Contest is open to all writers and offers cash awards and industry contacts to the winners. A requirement of the competition is that at least one of the primary characters in the screenplay be gay or lesbian (bisexual, transgender, questioning, and the like) and that gay and lesbian characters must be portrayed positively. All writers are encouraged to enter!

-----OneInTen Screenplay Contests 

The requirement that the gay character MUST be portrayed positively - as opposed to "authentically", or "realistically" -  reeks of that smiling, politically correct totalitarianism which any alert gay man would realize is intended to keep him in a perceptual gulag.  

One would have thought that the real definition of Pride is to tell it like it is.  Apparently not.  Pride is just the carnival.  If there’s a requirement that a positive spin be put on a gay character, that’s a clear sign that something  about the person, or his gay environment,  is in dire need of manipulation.

If gay men are so OUT, why not advertise for screenwriters to frankly and unashamedly tell it like it is?  FuelMix is hardly the only one to have noticed what Faggotry has become and where it’s headed. The thousands of men who are “questioning” [see above quote] aren’t agonizing whether to suck cock.  What they’re pissed off about is their refusal to swallow what Gay Lamestream Media is trying to fuck down their throats -  and questioning just who or what is controlling Gay Lamestream Media, and why.

Not to be rude, but if the fictional gay man is to be “portrayed positively” why not add the prefix, “HIV” and he’s good to go......?

Originally published 16 May 2011
Amended and Republished 19 July 2013  | 31 October 2014

Copyright © 2006 – 2014 FuelMix All Rights Reserved