Armed And Queer 3

  FuelMix has no religious or political affiliation

4.  Angry, Dazed and Confused..? You Should Be

4.  Angry, Dazed And Confused..?  You Should Be

 1.   If we're right and there is a Geopolitical Big Picture which actually sets the context, then it follows that what looks like a violent incident at a gay nightclub, for which the official narrative states there was only one actor, may be an orchestrated end product involving a hierarchy of control and command.

2.    That's why a strictly "gay analysis" as set out in Part 2, is futile.  It gets trapped in "our community" mentality and the enforced Political Correctness.  It goes nowhere fast.  And that is exactly how it is planned.  Stir up the "Outrage" with a few bullets and a body count in "the community" and let the thing go around in circles.  A perfect distraction from The Big Picture.

3.    Moreover, those orchestrating The Big Picture, set out in Part 2, are fully aware that the "gay analysis" also encourages the artificial feuding between the political Left And Right - which of course, they can also control via an Hegelian Dialect (an artificially created duality where both sides can be manipulated to achieve a desired result):

• The Left being the so-called Progressive Liberals and Socialists calling for more gun control, tolerance and social integration;
• The Right insisting on the constitutional right of an individual to bear arms;

4.   To those orchestrating The Big Picture, the emergence of gay gun groups according to plan, must be utterly laughable.  Historically, gays are Left wing but now find themselves sucking up to the Right.  As we pointed out in Part 1:

Further, screeching in support of the constitutional right for gays to bear arms - flavoured with "gays as targets" - is just perfect to attract, and has attracted, predictable allies such as  The National Rifle Association and unlikely allies such as conservative religious groups. The former need gays to stack the numbers for their agenda. The latter view homosexuality as a choice and a sin. In other words, "we abhor your ass-fuckin', cock-suckin' proclivities, but we applaud your choice of calibre weapon".

5.   As we also pointed out in Part 1, gays shifting to the Right is uncharted territory. 

6.   At this point in time, our suspicion is that there will be a sub-set of gays who can only see things through a "gay analysis".  It is this sub-set that will actively advocate arming gays.  Remember, the Politically Correct vocabulary has already been set.  Expect to see descriptions like:

• "protection against daily acts of sexually oriented terrorism" or
• "ensuring that acts of micro-aggression do not inflate" or
• "to protect my dignity against acts of outrage and violation"

7.   The awkward fact that gays calling for weaponry overlook is that those allegedly advocating a crazed, violent, religious and political ideology are NOT targeting gays per se.  They've shown themselves willing to kill anyone, regardless of age, gender and orientation.  Heck, they even murder their own kind for not being zealous enough.

8.   The shooting at the gay nightclub was never about killing or "targeting" gay men and women. It was the sequential implementation of an utterly perverse, genocidal, geopolitical Big Picture intended to confiscate individual rights and freedom - regardless of whether you're carrying a holster.  Once the pathological audacity of The Big Picture is glimpsed and appreciated, the real criminals can be identified. 

9.   Only then will you be able to reclaim your dignity, your safety - and your freedom. Gay or straight.

Copyright © 2006 – 2016 FuelMix All Rights Reserved