Discrimination Via Geography
Discrimination is rife in Fagland. Whether it's age, looks, physical build, dick size, ethnicity, discrimination - often with astonishingly bad manners - is simply accepted as fag etiquette. One might observe that for all the attention fags give to their grooming and appearance the notion of grooming their manners, doesn't compute.
But what about Discrimination via Geography..?
One of the decisions FuelMix has to make is whether to knowingly have action with a ghetto fag. Generally, FuelMix declines. There is enough statistical evidence to show that clustering in ghettos leads to a higher concentration of STDs, susceptibility to HIV and chem use.
Critics will argue that STDs are all over the urban map and that it is immature and discriminatory to paint all ghetto fags with the same brush. FuelMix agrees and acknowledges there may be some responsible fags tucked away there.
However, let’s use an analogy. If you’re walking through a known and documented, crime ridden, dilapidated urban slum, are you really gonna flash your gold Rolex..? You’d be accused of taking an unnecessary risk endangering your health.
Could you also be mugged on a glitzy boulevard in full view of security cameras and where plainclothes cops were strolling..? Sure.
Similarly, if you’re walking through a known and documented area with a concentration of STDs, are you really gonna flash your cock and swap spit with every fag who smiles..? Could you not also be accused of taking an unnecessary risk endangering your health..?
Could you also acquire STDs from a fag professional in a 5-star hotel in the business district..? Sure.
If you choose not to walk through the crime ridden urban slum, are you being discriminatory..?
If you choose not to have action with a ghetto fag, are you being discriminatory..?
Depends. In both contexts, the conscious decision either way, is the exercise of discrimination i.e. the choice to take or not to take a course of action with potentially predictable results. And the potentiality of those results depends on how sharply a person distinguishes “risk” from “risky”.
But what about Discrimination via Geography..?
One of the decisions FuelMix has to make is whether to knowingly have action with a ghetto fag. Generally, FuelMix declines. There is enough statistical evidence to show that clustering in ghettos leads to a higher concentration of STDs, susceptibility to HIV and chem use.
Critics will argue that STDs are all over the urban map and that it is immature and discriminatory to paint all ghetto fags with the same brush. FuelMix agrees and acknowledges there may be some responsible fags tucked away there.
However, let’s use an analogy. If you’re walking through a known and documented, crime ridden, dilapidated urban slum, are you really gonna flash your gold Rolex..? You’d be accused of taking an unnecessary risk endangering your health.
Could you also be mugged on a glitzy boulevard in full view of security cameras and where plainclothes cops were strolling..? Sure.
Similarly, if you’re walking through a known and documented area with a concentration of STDs, are you really gonna flash your cock and swap spit with every fag who smiles..? Could you not also be accused of taking an unnecessary risk endangering your health..?
Could you also acquire STDs from a fag professional in a 5-star hotel in the business district..? Sure.
If you choose not to walk through the crime ridden urban slum, are you being discriminatory..?
If you choose not to have action with a ghetto fag, are you being discriminatory..?
Depends. In both contexts, the conscious decision either way, is the exercise of discrimination i.e. the choice to take or not to take a course of action with potentially predictable results. And the potentiality of those results depends on how sharply a person distinguishes “risk” from “risky”.
Semantic distinction..? Hardly. There is a huge difference between learning how to manage risk and engaging in risky behaviour. Tell that to the generic ghetto fag.
If he spits venom, be happy. You're cutting deep into him. Beyond the hype of "community", every fag subconsciously knows that there is a stigma associated with the ghetto. Face it, "lifestyle" and "bad health" are simultaneously similar and polar opposites. Only you know where you stand. A person having sex with you has to make a conscious risk analysis based on who you are and where you are.
FuelMix will continue to refuse sex with fags whom he knows, or suspects, to be living in or around the ghetto.
It's your health and it's a tough call and yes, it is discriminatory. But it's perfectly legal to do so.
Originally published 18 June 2006
Amended and Republished 7 August 2018
If he spits venom, be happy. You're cutting deep into him. Beyond the hype of "community", every fag subconsciously knows that there is a stigma associated with the ghetto. Face it, "lifestyle" and "bad health" are simultaneously similar and polar opposites. Only you know where you stand. A person having sex with you has to make a conscious risk analysis based on who you are and where you are.
FuelMix will continue to refuse sex with fags whom he knows, or suspects, to be living in or around the ghetto.
It's your health and it's a tough call and yes, it is discriminatory. But it's perfectly legal to do so.
Originally published 18 June 2006
Amended and Republished 7 August 2018
Copyright © 2006 – 2018 FuelMix All Rights Reserved
ON A MOBILE DEVICE, VIEW THE WEB VERSION OF THE BLOG
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.